Plant
Physiol.
(1984)
74,
112-116
0032-0889/84/74/0112/05/$01
.00/0
Terpenoid
Metabolism
in
Plastids'
SITES
OF
PHYTOENE
SYNTHETASE
ACTIVITY
AND
SYNTHESIS
IN
PLANT
CELLS
Received
for
publication
June
13,
1983
and
in
revised
form
September
6,
1983
BILAL
CAMARA*
Laboratoire
de
Regulations
Metaboliques
et
Diffterenciation
des
Plastes,
Tour
53,
2eme
etage,
Universite
Pierre
et
Marie
Curie
(Paris
6),
4
Place
Jussieu,
75230
Paris
Cedex
05
ABSTRACT
The
biosynthesis
of
phytoene
from
prephytoene
pyrophosphate
has
been
localized
exclusively
in
the
plastid
compartment
of
ruptured
proto-
plasts
derived
from
Triticum
leaves
and
Capsicum
fruits.
The
phytoene
synthetase
activity
in
Triticum
leaves
deficient
in
plastid
ribosomes
was
comparable
to
those
obtained
in
normal
leaves.
In
addition,
the
stimulation
of
phytoene
synthetase
activity
observed
in
green
Capsi-
cum
fruit
after
2-(4-chlorophenylthio)triethylamine
hydrochloride
treat-
ment
was
not
abolished
by
chlororamphenicol
and
lincomycin,
in
contrast
to
the
inhibition
observed
after
cycloheximide
treatment.
These
data
conclusively
show
that
phytoene
synthetase
is
localized
exclusively
in
the
plastid
compartment
in
higher
plants
and
that
its
synthesis
is
not
performed
on
70S
ribosomes.
Carotenoids
accumulate
predominantly
in
the
plastid
com-
partment
of
higher
plant
cells.
Increasing
evidence
has
estab-
lished
the
autonomy
of
plastids
in
the
formation
of
carotenoids
from
various
precursors.
The
site(s)
of
transcription
and
trans-
lation
of
the
enzymes
involved
in
the
synthesis
of
these
pigments
is
unresolved.
Earlier
studies
have
been
concerned
with
in
vivo
translation
inhibitor
treatments
or
with
mutations
which
alter
plastid
morphogenesis
and
carotenoid
accumulation
(29,
31).
The
enzyme
which
catalyzes
the
formation
of
the
first
carote-
noid
in
the
pathway,
i.e.
phytoene,
is
known
as
phytoene
syn-
thetase
(25).
The
intraplastidial
location
of
this
activity
has
been
demonstrated
recently
in
chromoplasts
(8,
22).
Here
we
present
evidence
that
this
enzyme
is
exclusively
localized
in
plastids
and
that
its
synthesis,
as
judged
by
the
activity
present
in
ribosome-
deficient
plastids
and
by
translation
inhibitor
treatments,
is
not
performed
on
70S
ribosomes.
MATERIALS
AND
METHODS
Plant
Material.
Wheat
leaves
(Triticum
sativum
L.
var
Flor-
ence
aurore)
and
Pepper
fruits
(Capsicum
annuum
L.
var
Yolo
wonder)
were
used.
Triticum
seeds
were
surface
sterilized
(12)
and
germinated
in
darkness
at
25°C
or
34°C
for
12
d.
The
first
leaf
was
used
for
experimentation.
For
protoplast
preparation,
Triticum
plants
were
grown
at
25°C
for
9
d
under
artificial
light
(5000
lux;
11
h
photoperiod).
Capsicum
fruits,
generously
pro-
vided
by
the
Senegal
Agriculture
Service,
were
harvested
at
mature
green
and
orange
stages.
Subcellular
Fractionation.
Protoplasts
were
isolated
(starting
'Supported
by
grants
from
the
'Direction
de
la
Recherche
Universi-
taire'
and
from
the
'Centre
National
de
la
Recherche
Scientifique.'
from
5
to
10
g
fresh
weight)
and
purified
from
Triticum
leaves,
essentially
by
the
method
of
Lilley
et
al.
(23).
For
Capsicuim
protoplasts,
a
method
modified
from
Fujiwake
et
al.
(18)
and
Lilley
et
al.
(23)
was
adopted.
Thin
pericarp
slices
were
digested
in
the
presence
of
0.5%
macerozyme,
2%
cellulase,
500
mm
sorbitol,
0.05%
PVP,
0.1
mm
CaCl2,
and
5
mm
Mes
(final
pH
5.5).
The
released
protoplasts
were
monitored
by
light
micros-
copy
and
filtered
through
Blutex
(100
,m
apertures).
The
crude
Capsicum
protoplast
suspension,
after
centrifugation
at
lOOg
for
5
min,
was
suspended
in
the
medium
of
500
mm
sucrose
and
50
mM
Mes,
pH
6,
and
centrifuged
at
lOOg
for
2
min.
The
protoplast
suspension
was
diluted
(1
ml
suspension
+
0.5
ml
50
mm
Mes,
pH
6),
and
protoplasts
were
ruptured
by
four
passages
through
a
10-ml
syringe
fitted
with Blutex
(20
gm
apertures).
The
resulting
suspension
(3
ml)
was
layered
on
the
top
of
a
sucrose
gradient
(30-60%,
w/w)
containing
50
mM
Tris-
HCI
(pH
7.6)
and
centrifuged
at
100,000g
in
a
Beckman
L50
ultracentrifuge
equipped
with
the
SW27
rotor
for
1
h.
Fractions
(1.5
ml)
were
collected
and
enzyme
markers
(see
below)
were
used
to
locate
the
different
cellular
fractions.
Enzyme
Assays.
The
different
assays
were
performed
using
a
cell-free
system
prepared
as
follows:
excised
plant
material
(1
g
fresh
weight/2
ml
medium
containing:
5
mM
MgC92,
5
mm
DTT,
0.25
M
sucrose,
50
mM
Tris-HCI,
pH
7.8)
was
homogenized
in
a
Waring
Blendor
at
full
speed
for
3
x
4
s
and
the
supernatant
obtained
after
centrifugation
at
1SOg
for
5
min
was
used
for
enzyme
assays.
RuBP2
carboxylase
(EC
4.1.1.39)
was
assayed
according
to
Bravdo
et
al.
(6).
NADP-glyceraldehyde
phosphate
dehydroge-
nase
(EC
1.2.1.13)
was
assayed
as
described
by
Bradbeer
et
al.
(5).
Catalase
(EC
1.1
1.1.6)
was
determined
as
described
by
Luck
(24).
The
method
described
by
Hackett
et
al.
(20)
was
used
for
Cyt
c
oxidase
(EC
1.9.3.1).
Phytoene
synthetase
was
assayed
as
described
by
Camara
et
al.
(9).
Fractions
(0.25
ml)
derived
from
the
sucrose
gradients
or
cell-free
extracts
(5
mg
protein)
were
incubated
in
the
presence
of
(2
ml
final
volume)
[3H]prephytoene
pyrophosphate
(
12
Ci/mol,
0.5
,uCi)
(synthesized
by
the
addition
of
trans-diazogeranylgeranial
into
a
chilled
ether
solution
con-
taining
zinc
iodide
and
trans-geranylgeraniol
followed
by
phos-
phorylation
of
the
resulting
alcohol
[9]),
1
mM
KF,
10
mM
MgC92,
5
mM
MnCl2,
10
mm
DTT,
and
buffered
with
50
mM
Tris-HCl,
pH
7.6.
The
reaction
was
incubated
at
25°C
for
4
h
in
the
case
of
fractions
derived
from
the
sucrose
gradients
and
for
1
h
in
the
other
cases.
The
reactions
were
terminated
by
the
addition
of
acetone:
ethanol
(2:1,
v/v).
Phytoene
was
extracted
after
the
addition
of
authentic
standard
(1
mg)
and
purified
by
TLC
as
described
by
Camara
et
al.
(8).
The
protein
content
was
2Abbreviations:
RuBP,
ribulose
bisphosphate;
CPTA,
2-(4-chloro-
phenylthio)triethylamine
hydrochloride;
Ethephon,
(2-chloro-
ethyl)phosphonic
acid.
112