2BDoD 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 4, Chapter 22
*December 2013
22-6
as a direct organization. The distinction between the macro and micro levels will be an important
consideration in complying with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) productivity
requirements discussed in section 2204 of this chapter. The cost accountant must be able to
translate the measurement requirements into source documents, allocation techniques, and other
such analysis techniques as necessary to meet the management requirement. Establishing a cost
object is a management decision and is essential to the proper application of cost finding
techniques to a cost object.
D. Identifying and describing cost objects are very important. Within the
Department of Defense, cost finding techniques may be used to compare costs of different
organizational units or operations performing the same cost object, prepare budget justification
material, to measure productivity, or to measure the cost of performing a particular operation. For
example, the costs to issue an electronic funds transfer payment at a disbursing office might be
compared with the same costs at other disbursing offices. Cost finding techniques are a tool in
identifying more efficient methods of performing a task. Cost objects may also be used to compare
organizational efficiency. For example, the costs for an intermediate object, such as processing a
personnel action at a personnel office, might be compared with the cost at other personnel offices.
220203. Identification of Organizations Involved
A. Once the cost objects have been identified, the organizational units
contributing resources to the cost object must be identified. Generally, the units will be within the
organization itself (the installation or unit level; and possibly further within these levels).
B. The initial task is to classify the installation-level organizational units as
direct or indirect. A unit responsible for actually performing the work is direct. A unit that
provides support or performs an administrative function is indirect.
1. Organizations or units may be either direct or indirect depending on
the cost objects identified.
2. An organization classified as indirect will not always be recognized
in the computation of costs for a final cost object. At the macro level, staff organizations generally
will be recognized as an indirect organization and the related costs allocated among direct
organizations. At the micro level, materiality and usefulness will be determining factors.
C. Organizational units can be classified through use of an iterative process or
through the use of organizational charts or tables. The iterative process is a series of questions
designed to establish the relationship each organization has with the product or service for which
cost finding techniques are being developed (Figure 22-1 is a suggested list of such questions).
First, the organizational units directly involved in the process are identified. Then the
organizations providing indirect functions to the direct organizations are identified through an
iterative process consisting of a series of questions designed to establish the relationship of
supporting activities to direct line organizations. The procedure is repeated until all organizational
units are classified as direct or indirect for all identified cost objects.