NOAA
Technical Memorandum
NMFS-SEFSC-438
Nk
q.'A'T
O
F
C. 0.
CRUISE RESULTS
WINDWARDS HUMPBACK
(Megaptera novaeangliae)
SURVEY
NOAA SHIP
Gordon Gunter Cruise
GU-00-01
9
February to
3
April 2000
Steven L. Swartz
Southeast Fisheries Science Center,
NOAA
Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Mimi
Laboratory,
75
Virginia Beach Drive, Mimi, Florida 33149
Carolyn Burks
Southeast Fisheries Science Center,
NOAA
Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
Pascagoula Laboratory, P.O. Drawer
1207,
Pascagoula, Mississippi
39568-1207
U-S.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Marine Fisheries Service
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
75
Virginia Beach Drive
Miami, Florida 33149
May 2000
1% ku
It-0'T?ArES
Of
NOAA
Technical Memorandum
NMFS-SEFSC-438
CRUISE RESULTS
WENDWARDS HUMPBACK
(Megaptera nevaeangliae)
SURVEY
NOAA SHIP
Gordon Gunter Cruise
GU-00-01
9
February to
3
April 2000
Steven L. Swartz
Southeast Fisheries Science Center,
NOAA
Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Miami
Laboratory,
75
Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, Florida 33149
Carolyn Burks
Southeast Fisheries Science Center,
NOAA
Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
Pascagoula Laboratory, P-0. Drawer
1207,
Pascagoula, Mississippi
39568-1207
U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
William M. Daley, Secretary
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
D.
James Baker, Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere
National Marine Fisheries Service
Penelope
D.
Dalton, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
May 2000
This Technical Memorandum series is used for documentation and timely communication of
preliminary results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the
memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control, or detailed editing, they
are expected to reflect sound professional work.
'TM
NOTICE
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NWS)
does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product
of material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to
NNTS
or to this publication furnished
by
NMFS,
in any advertising or sales promotion which would imply the
NMFS
approves, recommends, or endorses
any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein or which has as its purpose any intent to cause
directly or indirectly the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this
NMFS
publication.
Summary
A
visual and acoustic survey of the Eastern Caribbean Islands from St. Kitts to Trinidad, and from Venezuela to
Guadeloupe, was conducted from
9
February to
3
April 2000 for humpback whales on the 224 foot
NOAA
research
vessel Gordon Gunter. The survey involved scientists from several Southeastern Caribbean nations and the United
States, and was sponsored
by
IOCARIBE- This report presents the preliminary fmdings of this survey. Three or
four observers using
150
mm objective binoculars and handheld binoculars maintained a visual watch. The acoustic
survey was conducted using directional (DIFAR) sonobuoys. Acoustic and visual whale detections of humpback
whales were compared.
This report should be cited as follows:
Burks,
C.
and Swartz,
S.L.
2000. Cruise Results, Windwards Humpback Whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae)
Survey,
NOAA
SHIP Gordon Gunter Cruise
GU-00-01, 9
February to
3
April 2000.
NOAA
Technical
memorandum
NMFS-SEFSC-43 8, 3 1 p.
This report has an internal document number PRD-99/00-09.
Copies may be obtained
by
writing:
Director, Protected Resources Branch
Southeast Fisheries Science Center
75
Virginia Beach Drive
Mimi, FL 33149
Or,
National Technical Information Center
5825
Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA
22161
(800) 553-6847
or
(703) 605-6000
<http://www.ntis.gov/numbers.htm>
ii
DI'MODUCTION
The
NOAA
Ship
Gordon Gzwter
departed Pascagoula, Mississippi on
9
February 2000 to
conduct a survey of humpback whales
(Megaptera novaeangliae)
and other cetaceans in coastal,
shelf and deep waters of the Southeastern Caribbean Islands, the "Windwards" (Fig.
1).
This
survey was sponsored
by
the National Marine Fisheries Service's
(NMF S)
Southeast Fisheries
Science Center (SEFSC),
and the International Oceanographic Commission's IOCARfBE
organization, a multinational organization for the coordination of marine research in the wider
Caribbean. The scientific staff included researchers from a number of Southeastern Caribbean
nations and the United States. The purpose of this survey was to visit areas where humpback
whales were previously hunted to depletion
by
commercial whalers, and to determine whether
the whales have recovered and re-occupied these areas. Previous research indicates that
humpback whales migrate from summer feeding grounds in the North Atlantic to winter mating
and calving areas in the northern West Indies and south to the northern coast of South America.
Whales from the eastern United States, eastern Canada, Greenland, Iceland, and Norway all mix
spatially and breed in the West Indies, but their status in the Southeastern Caribbean has not
been assessed. Humpback whales will be the subject of a Comprehensive Assessment
by
the
International Whaling Commission in June 200
1,
and scientific information on the status of
humpback whales in the Southeastern Caribbean is relevant to that assessment, and is relevant to
U.S.
management requirements for endangered whales under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act and the Endangered Species Act. In addition to humpback whales, opportunistic
observations and biopsy samples were collected from other cetacean species that were
encountered in the Southeastern Caribbean-
OlUECTIVES
1.
Assess current distribution and relative densities of humpback whales in historically
important habitats.
2- Photograph and biopsy sample humpback whales for individual identification, as well
as toxicological and stable isotope analyses, to determine-the relationship of these whales
with
the greater North Atlantic population.
3
I
Opportunistically obtain biopsy samples of other cetacean species, including Bryde's
whales, sperm whales and other odontocetes.
4. Opportunistically collect data on the distribution and relative densities of seabirds and
other marine life.
5.
Collect associated environmental data at survey locations.
I
COUNTRY
CLEARANCES
Clearance to conduct this survey in the waters of the nations of the Southeastern Caribbean was
requested in August
1999,
six months prior to the beginning of the survey in February 2000
(Table
1).
Clearance for this multinational survey was received from the Dominican Republic,
St. Kitts and Nevis, Antigua Barbuda, Guadeloupe-Marie Galante, Martinique, St. Lucia, St.
Vincent and the Grenadines, Barbados, Grenada. Trinidad-Tobago, and Venezuela. Clearance
was not received from Dominica, Antigua, Barbuda and St. Vincent and Grenadines. When the
survey arrived at the waters of those countries that had not provided clearance, all scientific
operations were suspended and the vessel proceeded
by
right of innocent passage through that
nation's waters. Scientific operations resumed once the vessel had entered the waters of a nation
that had provided clearance for the survey.
METHODS
Data on the presence and distribution of cetaceans were collected using visual observers
in conjunction with passive acoustic monitoring, Humpback whales were considered the primary
species and were located visually and acoustically. Photographs and biopsy samples were
obtained for individual identification.
All
other cetacean species opportunistically encountered
were recorded, and when possible, photographs and biopsy samples were obtained.
Visual Survey
Visual survey operations for cetaceans were conducted using two teams of three
observers during daylight hours, weather permitting (i.e., no rain, Beaufort sea state
<7,
winds
approximately 22 kts.). Each team consisted of marine manimal observers experienced in
shipboard cetacean observation and identification techniques. Two observers searched for
cetaceans using 25X "bigeye" binoculars mounted on the ship's flying bridge. The third observer
recorded data and maintained a search of the area near the ship using unaided eye or
7X
hand-
held binoculars. Data were recorded on a laptop computer using a data acquisition and logging
software program that interfaced with the ship's a global positioning system
(GPS).
Environmental data recorded included sea state, surface temperature, water depth, weather,
visibility, wind direction and speed, and sun glare in the observer's field of view. Cetacean
sighting data included species, group-size, presence of calves, bearing from the bow, linear
distance from the ship when detected, and behavioral observations.
In accordance with Research Permit No.
779-IJ39
issued to the
SEFSC by
the National
2
Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources, data on behavioral responses of
cetaceans to the survey vessel were recorded.
A
complete record of this information may be
obtained from the SEFSC's Pascagoula Laboratory.
Acoustic
S
The acoustic survey was conducted using DIFAR directional sonobuoys. These
sonobuoys contain a compass in the sensor head and transmits continuous signals containing
directional information on sound sources back to the ship. The buoy transmits these sigrtals on a
VHF radio carrier in an analog multiplexed format which is de-multiplexed to extract the
direction information in degrees magnatic: from the sonobuoy to the sound source. The magnetic
accuracy to a sound source using these buoys has a standard deviation of two degrees. Calling
whales were detected on two or more buoys separated
by
several kilometers baseline distance,
and the magnetic bearings to the source of the calls from the buoys determined. When two or
more bearings crossed with a sufficient baseline separation it was possible to precisely locate the
position of a calling whale. The ship was then directed to the location of the calling whale and
attempts were made to locate the whale visually.
A NOAA
Technical Memorandum describing
the details of the passive acoustics activities and methods utilized during this survey may
be
obtained from the Protected Species Branch,
SEFSC,
Miami Laboratory.
Cetacean Biopsy Samplin
Biopsy samples of skin and blubber were collected from humpback whales and other
cetacean species encountered during the survey. Samples of skin and blubber approximately
0.75
cm
x
0.75
cm were collected
by SEFSC
staff authorized as collection agents under
CITES
permit No.
99USO 1
5415/9 and Endangered Species Act
(ESA)
and Marine Mammal Protection
Act
(MMPA)
permit No. PRT 10233 issued to the United States National Museum of Natural
History. Samples were collected for genetic analyses to determine the relationship of humpback
whales in the southeastern Caribbean to the greater North Atlantic population, toxicological and
stable isotope analyses. Samples were collected using either a modified crossbow or a modified
.22 caliber dart rifle. Both of these sampling devices were fitted with specially designed darts
tipped with biopsy sampling heads that extract a small plug of tissue from the animals. Biopsy
sampling was conducted from the bow of the
Gordon Gunter
as well as from rigid-bottom
inflatable boats that were launched ftom the
Gordon Gunter. 6ata on each biopsy sampling
attempt were recorded in a log book, and included the date, time, platform, sampler and recorder
names, field number, sampling device, species sampled, location
(GPS),
number
of
attempts
(successful and misses), body location struck and sampled, and behavioral reaction of the
subject animal.
A
complete log of biopsy sampling operations and activities may be obtained
from the
SEFSC
Pascagoula Laboratory.
3
PhotoQxWhLc Identification
Vanations; of dorsal humps and pigmentation patterns on the underside of the tail flukes
of humpback whales can be used to identify individual animals. Photographs were taken on
black and white
ASA
400 film with
35
mm cameras equipped with
200-300
mm telephoto
lenses. Attempts were made to photograph all whales and especially those from which biopsy
samples were obtained Other species of cetaceans were opportunistically photographed for
species identification.
Environmental Data
Water temperature data were collected using a
SBE9/11
Continuous Time Depth
(CTD)
recorder at the request of the acoustic team leader to provide a temperature-depth profile to
model the transmission of sound at depth. Additional environmental information from
shipboard sensors was recorded
by
the shipboard Scientific Computer System
(SCS).
The
SCS
continuously displayed and recorded the ship's position, heading and speed, wind speed and
direction, barometric pressure, sea surface and air temperature, and water depth.
RESULTS
Cetacean Visual Surv
During the
3 7
days at sea, a total of 45 84 Ian were surveyed on effort during daylight
hours (Table 2, Fig.
1)-
Daily effort ranged up to 14.6 hours/day and 242 km/day and averaged
7.5
hours/day and 124 km/day.
A
total of
196
cetacean groups were sighted (Leg
1, 68
groups
Leg 2,
128
groups) (Tables
3,
4 and
5,
Fig- 2-
10).
At least
19
cetaccan species were observed-
The highest number of cetacean groups sighted on one day was 20 on March
26,
2000 during the
transect south
of
Puerto Rico (Table
3).
The most commonly sighted species were humpback
whales (n
= 3'
:)),
bottlenose dolphins
(Tursiops truncatusXn
=
19),
and sperm whales
(Physeter
macrocephalus) (n
= 16)
(Table
3).
Of
the
33
sightings of humpback whales,
18
were of single whales, 2 sightings of three
whales, and
8
sightings of 2 whales (including two cow-calf pairs). Humpback whale mean
group size was 1.4 (Table 4). Humpback whales were seen in both shallow and deep water.
Water depths at sighting locations ranged from
27
to
5029
m with a mean depth of
586
m (Table
4). The largest groups of other cetaceans observed included a group of
175
pantropical spotted
dolphins (Stenella attenuata)
and a group of
175
spinner dolphins
(Stenella longirostris).
Spinner dolphins had the largest mean group size with
105
animals per group.
While humpback whale song was heard throughout the entire survey area (see Acoustic
Survey below), except for three sightings north of Puerto Rico, visual sightings of humpback
whales were made only in the areas from Guadeloupe south to Trimdad-Tobago and Venezuela
4
(Fig.
3).
The few visual sightings of humpback whales compared to the number acoustic
detections of singing whales is attributed to the generally high Beaufort Sea State
(5+
on
average) and the relatively brief periods that humpback whales spent at the surface. Eighteen
humpback sightings occurred in waters east of Trinidad and Tobago (including one cow-calf
pair),
6
in Guadeloupe and Marie Galante waters, and 2 sightings each off Barbados and
Martinique, one sighting off Venezuela, and the remaining sighting of a cow-calf pair off
southern end of Grenada (Fig.
3)^
Sightings of three species of odontocete cetaceans off Trinidad-Tobago and Venezuela
were of particular note. Observers agreed that these animals appeared to be smaller than the
same species found in the Gulf of Mexico. This size difference was first noted when a group of
what appeared to be Atlantic spotted dolphins or bottlenose dolphin came to ride the bow of the
Gordon Gunter.
These animals were all approximately the same size and at first appeared to be
juvenile bottlenose dolphins. However upon closer examination it was noted that some animals
in the group were spotted like Atlantic spotted dolphins. This size variation was also noted in a
group of rough-toothed dolphins
(Steno bredanensis)
encountered off the east coast of Trinidad,
and a group of spinner dolphins north of the Venezuelan and Trinidad border.
Associations between cetacean species were noted on five occasions. On two occasions
rough-tooth dolphins were associated with humpback whales. In both cases the rough-tooth
dolphins were observed from the small inflatable boats while approaching a humpback whale
during attempts to obtain biopsy samples. In both instances the rough-toothed dolphins
attempted to ride the small boat's bow wake. Pilot whales were sighted in association with
Fraser's dolphins
(Lagenodelphis hosei)
and Atlantic spotted dolphins were associated with the
smaller boftlenose/Atlantic spotted dolphins noted in the previous paragraph.
Acoustic
S
A
small number of sonobuoys were deployed while tratisiting through the Gulf of
Mexico and along the southern sides of Silver and Navidad Banks north of the Dominican
Republic to test and calibrate the passive acoustic recording and tracking systems. Passive
survey effort began when the vessel reached the waters of St. Kitts and Nevis.
A
total of
176
sonobuoys were deployed throughout the study area.
A
total of
96
sonobuoys were deployed
during Leg
I
(Fig.
11).
Survey effort for Leg 2 began in Venezuelan waters and a total of
80
sonobuoys were deployed. These included
16
sonobuoys depl4ed near and to the north of
Puerto Rico and the northern coast of the Dominican Republic to obtain recordings of humpback
song for comparison with song recorded in more southerly areas (Fig. 12).
Humpback whale song was detected throughout virtually the entire area surveyed in the
Southeastern Caribbean.
A
number of islands were not surveyed acoustically either due to time
constraints or lack of clearance to conduct surveys those waters. The number of acoustic
detections derived from the sonobuoy tapes was used to estimate the number of singing
humpback whales along that portion of the survey track line. The estimated number of singing
5
whales in each area.surveyed is shown in Table
6. A
total of
30
singing whales were detected
during "on effort" surveys during Leg
I
and 44 during Leg 2 of the survey. This is compared to
8
and
15
humpback whales sighted during the same "on efforf
'
survey in Legs
1
and 2,
respectively. The greater number of acoustic detections relative to visual sightings demonstrates
the advantage of passive acoustic over visual methods for surveys in these areas and during
environmental conditions that severely limit the effectiveness of visual methods. Future analyses
of these data will form the basis of an estimation of the relative density of humpback whales in
the Southeastern Caribbean.
Cetacean Biol)s
Nineteen biopsy samples were obtained during the cruise (Leg
1,
n
= 3;
Leg 2, n
= 16)
(Table
7).
Humpback whale biopsies were considered the primary objective, and three skin and
blubber samples were collected (Fig-
14
In addition, six other species were sampled including
Atlantic spotted dolphin (n
= 1),
Common dolphin (n
8),
Bryde's whale (n
= 1),
bottlenose
dolphins (n
=
4), and pantropical. spotted dolphins (n 2) (Figs.
133
andl4). Humpback whale
biopsy samples were sent to Dr. Per
J.
Palsboll at the University of Wales Bangor, United
Kingdom for analysis, archiving, and comparison with the North Atlantic humpback whale
population genetic database.
All
other biopsy samples were sent to Dr. Patty Rosel at the
NOAA,
National Ocean Service
(NOS)
Laboratory in Charleston, South Carolina for analysis
and archiving.
Environmental data
Profiles from the
SBE 9/11
Sea logger
CTD,
other environmental data, and data from the
ship's
SCS
were returned to the
NMFS
Pascagoula Laboratory for editing and archiving.
. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank IOCARIBE for their sponsorship and encouragement of this multi-
national survey for humpback whales in the Southeastern Caribbean. We also extend our
gratitude to the Eastern Caribbean nations that provided clearance to conduct this survey and that
provided assistance during the cruise. Special thanks go to the Officers and Crew of the
NOAA
ship Gordon Gunter, and the staff of the
SEFSC
Pascagoula Laboratory for logistical and
technical support. We could not have had a more dedicated scientific team, that often preformed
above and beyond the normal call of duty. To all of the science party from all of the participating
nations, we are pleased to have sailed with you and hope we will work together again.
Assistance critical to the success of this survey was provided
by
many individuals, but we wish
to especially thank Fred Berry, Bradford Brown, David Chadee, Phil Clapham, Tom Coxe,
Shelby Drummond, Wayne Hoggard, Keith Mullin, Randi Olsen, Charlie Potter, Per Palsboll,
Randy Reeves, Carol Roden, Donna Spencer, Rafael Steer-Ruiz, and Jim Tobias.
6
CRUISE
PARTICIPANTS
Leg
1 (9
February
- 7
March 2000)
Name
Carolyn Burks
Steven Swartz
Carol Roden
Charlotte Cates
Eric Zolman
David Weller
Mark McDonald
Rene DeVito
Jenny Litz
Grisel Ferrer
Jay Barlow
Barbara Miller
Title
Field Party Chief
Principal Investigator
Fishery Biologist
Fishery Biologist
Biologist
Research Scientist
Acoustician
Biologist
Biologist
Graduate Student
Research Scientist
Cooperator
Orgarazati
NMFS,
Pascagoula,
MS
NMFS,
Miami, FL
NWS,
Pascagoula,
MS
Contractor, Pascagoula,
MS
NOS,
Charleston,
SC
SWFSC,
La Jolla,
CA
Whale Acoustics, Laramie, WY
Medford, OR
SEFSC,
Miami, FL
University
Of
Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico
SWFSC,
La Jolla,
CA
American Embassy, Bridgetown, Barbados
Leg 2
(9
March
- 3
April 2000)
Name
Tony Martinez
Tim Cole
Kevin Rademacher
Denice Drass
Harriet Corbett
Danielle Savarese
Tom Fernald
John Hildebrand
Erin Oleson
Maria Morete
Ana Fretias
Dianna Mora Pinto
Analisa Tam
Title
Field Party Chief
Principal Investigator
Fishery Biologist
Fishery Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Biologist
Acoustician
Acoustician
Biologist
Biologist
Graduate Student
Graduate Student
Organization
NNTS,
Miami, Fl,
NNES,
Woods Hole,
MA
NWS,
Pascagoula,
MS
NMFS,
Pascagoula,
MS
Roberts, MT
Cetacean Research Unit, Glouchester, MA
College of the Atlantic, Bar Habor,
ME
Scripps Institute, San Diego,
CA
Scripps Institute, San Diego,
CA
Brazil Humpback Program, San Paulo, BR
Brazil Humpback Program, San Paulo, BR
University of Puerto Rico, Lajas, PR
Institute of Marine Affairs, Port of Spain,TT
7
APPROVALS:
Submitted
by:
Approved
by:
Steven L. Swartz Nancy Tho
Principal Investig Southeast
n, Icting Direct
isheriesiScience Center
8
( ^
wh^
of
ff
Table
1.
2000 Windwards Humpback Whale Cruise: List of Country Clearances
Clearance received Clearance revoked
Dominican Republic 1/4/00
St. Mus
&
Nevis
11116/99
Antigua
&
Barbuda
9/29100 1/27/00
revoked
Guadeloupe-Mane Galante 2/l/00
Dominica
1/26/00
denied
Martinique 2/l/00
St. Lucia
1/11/00
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
11/22/99 2/l/00
revoked
Barbados 10/8/99
Grenada 1/10/00
Trinidad-Tobago 1/24100
Venezuela
318/00
Table 2. Survey cruise effort hours, transect Hometers, average sea state, and number of cetacean sightings.
SPECEES
EFFORT
TRANSECT AVERAGE NUMBER
OF
HOURS
KILOMETERS
SEA STATE
SIGHTINGS
LEG 1
2000 Feb
9
Depart Pascagoula, Mississippi
2000
Feb
15
Arrive
Sai,
Juan, Puerto Riw
Depart Sart Juart,
Puerto Rico
2000 Feb,
17
4.5
783
4.9
0
2000
Feb 18 8.7
1549
5.3
0
2000
Feb 19
6.9
126.5 5.3
4
2000 Feb 20
6-9
119.4
3^8 3
2000 Feb 21
6.6
114.8 3.4
6
2000 Feb 22 4.1
66.0
4.3 2
2000
Feb 23
8.4
133.1
4.3 4
2000 Feb 24 Arrive Bridgetunwa Barbados
5-2 89.3
4.1 2
2000 Feb
26
Depart Bridgetcrimn, Barbados 6.4 124.0
3.0 3
2000
Feb
27 8.3
149.6
3.3
2
2000 Feb 28 4.2
58.1 3.8
4
2000
Feb 29 10.7
211.1 40
1
2000 Mar
01 8.0 127.3
5.0
1
2000
Mar
02 4.8
821 3.7 3
2000 Mar
03 2.5 380 5.0 19
2000 Mar 04 14.6
227.5
4.3 4
2000 Mar
05
6.6 111.6
4.2
6
2000 Mar
06 0.3
4.3
5.0
2000 Mar
07
ArrivePontof Spain, Trinidad
TOTAL
LEG
2
2000 Mar
09 Depant
Pon of Spain, Trinidad
2000 Mar
11
2000
Mar
12
20M Mar
13
2000 Mar 14
2000 Misr
15
2000
Mar
16
2000
Mar
17
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar
20
2000 Mar 21
2000 Mar 22
2000 Mar
23
Arrived Bridgew" Barbados
2000 Mar 24 Departed Bridgetavvn Barbados
2000 Mar
25
2000
Mar
26
2000 Mar
27
Arrived San Juan, Puerto Rico
2000
Mar
28 Departed
San
Juan, Puerto Rico
2000 Apr
29
2000 Apr
Of
2000 Apr 02
2000 Apr
03
Arrive Pascagouta, Misisuppi
117.9
2014.9
49
10 - 3
49
9.2
8.2
9.2
9.0
11.0
10.6
73
9.9
34
9-5
63
7 1
6.2
11 5
11.8
10.6
68
90.0 5.0 1
142.7
5.0
2
. 1
4.2
1
15
LA
3.2 L 5
1313
4.0
7
7W6
4.2
9
93.1 2.7
5
422
3.5
8
L57-9
3.4 4
2.9 6
1099
2.4
3
551
2.1
5
191 1 2.6 17
116^7 2.6 13
135.9 1.3
20
128.0 3.2
2
137.3 2.9 5
'42.2
3.7
197-f 3.7
2
TOTAL
160.9 2569.3
128
TOTAL
278.8
4584.2
196
to
Table
3.
Number of sightings of cetacean species during each leg of Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1, February
9 -
April
3,
2000.
SPECFES
Fin whale
(Balaepoplera physalw)
Bryde's whale
(BaLenoptera edeni)
Humpback whale
(U-&-piera n-ngfiae)
Sperm
whale
(P4seter memcephatur)
Dwarf spertnt whale
(Kogia siona)
Cavier's beaked whale
(Zohius catn^tns)
Blainville's beaked whale
(Mevaplodon demmviriv)
Melon-headed whale
(Peponacephala electra)
False killer whale
(Pseudorca ,=,d^ns)
Rough-vtothed dolphin
(Slenv
hmdtuiensis)
Ft-asex's dolphin
(Lagenodelphis h^ei)
Bottlenose dolphins
(Tursiops Inotcalus)
Risso's dolphin
(C7,461PW
grae=)
Pantropical spotted dolphin
(SYe"31a attenuota)
Atlantic spotted dolphin
(Stanella.frontalis)
Spinner dolphin
(SIMello 1001giMSOIS)
Balaenapterid whale
(Bal-noptera spp.)
Pygmy/Dwarf sperm whale
(Kagia spp.)
continued
LEG I LEG
2 TOTAL
17
16
5
33
15
U I
0 1
0
6 0
1 0
7
12
16
2
I
I
I
I
6
19
(I I I
4
6
to
8
2
0
4
0 3
I I
4
3
Table
3.
Continued.
SPECIES
Unidentified stenellid dolphin
(Stenella sno.)
Unidentified
Delphin^
dolphin
(Deiphinat spp.)
Umdenuffed M^oplodoa
(Xf-oplodon spp-)
Pilot whale
(Gl.hicejohala sppj
Boulenose/Adantic spotted dolphin
(Rimiops hunrotUs1Stene11afmnWfls)
Melon-headedlPygmy killerwhale
(Peponocephala electralFewsa atlenuata)
UnJdenfificd dolphin
Unidentified unall whale
Undentified
large
whale
Unidentified odomocete
TOTAL
LEG 1 LEG
2 TOTAL
4
0
2
5
2
7 0
0 1
6
20
0
I
4
5
68
128
5
I I
2
7
26
I
12
9
196
12
Table 4- Number of cetacean groups (n), mean group size, water depth, and sea surface temperature fbr cetacean
sightings during cruise
GU - 00 - 01,
February
9 -
April
3,
2000.
Group
Size
Water Depth
Sea Surface Temperature
(animals)
(meters) (degrees
Q
Species n Mean
(SE)
Range
Mean (SE)
Range
Me" (SE)
Range
B-ZMOP-Phys-^a
1 1.0 119 (63.0) 23.3
Balaenoptera edew
5
1.6
(0.24) 1-2
63 (19.7) 23-117
24.1
(0.26)
23.6-24.9
Megaplera ao^anglwe
13
1.4
(0.11) 1-3 586
(224.4)
27-5029 16.8
(0.12)
219 -
29. L
Pky,V^
-arlv^phaAw
16
Z7
(0.62)
1-11 1794 (169.4)
877-2498 27.2
M21)
26.0-300
K^gw 4..
1 30
t648
(950.0) 799 -
20H
26.7
(0-60) 2& f
- 273
Mphiw W^um
1 3.0
1499
27.2
M^pk,d^n demms^
1
2.0
3658
27.8
Peponocephala elmIM
1 38.0 1699 26.7
P,..d.,,a
^e,.dm
t
4.0
309
27.0
Sf^w bmd..^.is
6
9.4
(0.68) 8-11
54
(8.2)
31-74
27.2 (0,06) 27.1-27.4
L.gm^dalpha hasei
1 70.0 1280 26.5
Delpfia-^,Ap.
I
t
18.1
(5.46)
3-60 56
(4-2) 24-71
239 (0.29)
22.9-26.4
T^^uffls
"Www
19 13.5 (2-99) 1-50 399 (139.0)
20-2498
266 (D.29) 23.7-28.6
Gr=p= '^ew
1 3.0
2498 27.4
Stemila spp.
5
29.2 (1629)
3-90
1129 (725.0)
249-4006 264
(0.79)
24.2-28.9
St.11. afan^
10 37.1 (15.90)
3
-
t75
1 t26 (93.0)
49-2506
26.6 (0.26)
24.6-27.4
Stenellafmnfaffs
8 16.0
(4-63) 4-4o
163
(104.2)
48-893 26.3
(0.30)
24.7-27.3
Stenell. Mngm^, 2
105.0
(70.00) 35-175
1556
(457.2)
1097-2012 26.6 (0.05) 26.6-26.7
B.I..P(,. pp.
4 1.2
(0.25)
1-2
77
(24.3)
9-10
24.0
(0.73) 23.0-26.2
K^gw spp
2
3.7 (0.88)
2.5
2225 (363.0)
14"
- 2597 27.5 (0.30 27.0 - 28.
1
Mesoplad..
pp,
2 2.0
(1.00) 1-3
2478
(180.0) 1299.1658 27.6 (0.10) 27.5 - 273
Gkb"^Ph'd. pp
7 70
(2.28)
3 - 18
1746
(252.0) 1006 -
2a35
26.7
(0.24)
25.8-27.7
r.
7 81
(1.47)
3-
12 49 (2.1) 42-55
26.7 (0.01) 26.7-26,8
P. ekc^p
a^n..&a
1 16.0 1536 26.8
Wideatilli.cl dolplm
26 9.6
(t.93) L
-30 902
(212.0) 38-4()24
26.1 (0-32) 22.6 -
21^.O
Unideatified malt whale
1 1.0 26 26.3
Unidentified Inc whale 12
13
(0.14) 1-2
601 (348-3)
35-4024 23.4 (1-94)
23-7 . 271
Unideatified adoaWeete
9 1.6 (0-29) 1.3 1859
(472-2) 165-4024
26.8 (0.17) 26-0-27.5
13
Table
5.
Summary of cetaccan sightings
by
day during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01
in the Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea,
February
9 -
April
3,
2000
(S =
effort status,
SST =
sea surface temperature).
DATE SPECIES
GROUPSIZE
POSITION
LS I DEPTH
S
(C) (in)
2000 Feb 1
9
Stenella anewtua
15
16'l 9' 61'09' 26.
1
1190 off
2000
Feb 19
Tuniops nunciziier
8 15,58, 6111Y 26.3 1190 off
2000 Feb
19
Stenefla attenuata
11 16'03'
61'49'
26.7 915 On
2000 Feb
19
Srenella anewrair
175 16*05' 6
1'49'
26.6 915 off
2000 Feb 20
Glabicephala spp.
12 14-59'
61* 15' 26.5 1501
on
2000 Feb 20 Unidentilied dolphin 14-37'
6rlT
26.5
1464 on
20()0 Feb 20
Physeter macncephalier
4 W37'
61"12' 26.3
1464 on
2000
Feb
20
Globicepkala spp.
3
14-18' 6&54'
26.5 1007 On
2000
Feb
20 Unidentified dolphin 14-42' 60'43'
26.5 512 Off
2000
Feb
21
Lagewdelphis hosei
70
14-44Y
61,115' 26.5
1291
Off
Glohreepluila
pp.
Is
2000 Feb 21 Unidentified ockirancete
3
14-38'
61-27' 26.5 2800 on
2000 Feb 21 Unidentified dolphin
3
14-33'
61^22' 26.6 2699 off
2000 Feb 21
Globicephala spp.
4 14-12' 6t-30'
25.8 2837
on
2000 Feb 21
Megapterv wiweangliae
1
14-13'
61-30' 26.7
2745
off
2000
Feb
212
Stenella attentaria
45
13.56' 61.09' 26.6 2507 on
2000
Feb
22 Unidentified large whale
1
13-54'
61.10' 26.5 1995
on
2000
Feb 23
Stenella longungne;
35
12.22'
6105' 26.7 1098
on
2000
Feb 23
Stenella longirostns
175
12.1
V
61AT
26.6 2013
on
2000 Feb
23
Megaptera noweanglicre
3 11,57'
6%50'
26.9
33
on
2000
Feb 23
Pseudorca crausidens
4
12N- 61,29' 27.0 301) on
2000 Feb 24
Tiffstaps n^urrcaw
4
13JO'
59,43'
26.6 381
on
2000
Feb
24 Unidentified dolphin
1 12,59' 59,31- 26.7
24?
on
2000 Feb
26
Unidentitiedodonvocco: 1 12.48-
59.47' 27.0 108
on
2000 Feb
26
Turwiops imneatus
12
[
2.45' 5^.48'
17^0 1098 Oil
2GOO
Feb
26 Globicepheila spp.
17
11.51-
60^14'
27.1 1601
on
2000 Feb
27
Tursiops rrtncoms
18 11 ^Olv 6030, 27.1 73
on
2000 Feb
27
Megaptera notweangliae
1 11^07- 60^ --, I - 27.2 77
on
2000
Feb 28
T rrzincatiWS. fitnualis
I [ W 36' 60
34'
26.8 53
on
2000
Feb 28
Hegarplem noi,,zeringhae
2
10:30- 60l36' 27.2 33 off
2000 Feb
28
Alegaptera noiwe=gliae
1 1025- 6d47- 27.3 3 j
on
Stew bredanensis
6
2000
Feb 29
Stenella spp
90 10 38' 61
47'
'7.7 160 on
2000 Mar
01
Megarnera novaeanglier
I
LW50-
ft^55, 27.1 53 on
2000 Mae 02
-Wegaptera novaeangliae
2 WOW 6656-
26.8 39
on
2000
Mar
02
T IrrincaftalS.fivnialis
12
1
1'04'
66'55'
26.9
42
off
2000 Mar 02
-VegapreTa nomeangliae
1 10'31Y 60'38' 27.0
40
off
2000 Mar
03
Stenellafmnialis
17 10'37'
W39' 26.8
51
Off
2000 Mar
03
T tmncatuslSfironlahs
a
10'345'
60'37'
26.8
55
off
2000 Mar
03
itfegaptera nowreangliae
2 10'34' W34'
26.7
48
011
2000 Mar
03
Slenellafinnialis
4
30'32' 6(Y35' 26.7
48 off
T hsaicaluslSfixinialiq
3
2000 Mar
03
Megoptera novarutnglure
2
10 29'
6036
27.
t 4() on
2000 Mar
03
Stew bredanensis
I I
tO-29'
60-3S' 27.1 38 off
2000
Mar
03
Un
identified dolphin 10,30' 6(Y'36
27.1
55
off
2000 Mar
03
Regaptera novaeangbae
2 11-04'
60`56' 26.8 38
on
2000 Mar
03
T truncatusl& fronealis
12
11
^04'
6&55' 26.8
42
off
2000 Mar
03
'Wegaptera novaeanghae
1 10-30' 6&38' 26.8
40
off
2000 Mar
03
Seenellafivnialis
17
10-371'
60,39' 27.0
51
Off
2000 Mar
03
T gruncatuxIS-firntafts
8 10-36' 60,37' 26.9 55 Off
2000
Mar
03
Megaptera numeangliae
2 10^34' 6(04'
26.9
48 on
2000 Mar
01
5^ewllafrwtahs
4
10-32' 60-35' 26.7
48 off
T truncatwlS. ftvntalis
3 1.
2000 Mar^
03
-Wegaprem wMeanglire
2
10 29' 60 36' 27.1
40 on
continued
14
Tab(e
5.
Continued.
DATE SPECEES
GROUP
SIZE POSMON
au DEPTH
(C) (m)
2000 Mar
01
sleno bredmiensis
I 1 10`29' 60'35' 27.1 38 off
20M
Met
03
Unidentified dolphin
LO'30'
60`161
27.1
55
off
2000 Mar 04
Tumops ^neatim
I
H*16'
60`28'
26.9
210
Off
20M
Mar
04 Unidentified odontocete
1
LO`46'
W
13'
27.1
641
on
20DO
Mar 04
7itumps h-tuicatus
I 11"16' 60129' 26.9
210
off
20M
Mar
04 Unidentified cdonlocete
1 1
0`46' 60'
13' 27.2
641 on
2000
Mar 05
Tivszops truncatus
8 L0`37'
60`45'
26.9
48
on
2000 Mar
05
Steno bmd^ensis
9
10-40' 60-24' 27.4
75 off
2000
Mar
05
Megaptera no^^amghae
3 10-36' 60`25' 27.0 71 on
2000 Mar
05
Steno, btvdanensa
8 LO-52' 60^33'
27.4
71
on
2000
Mar 05
Stenellafrontalis
6
J[050'
60 29' 27.3 57 on
2000 Mar
05
Wegapwra nov^ngfiae
1
10,49'
60,27' 27.3
84 on
20M Mar
06
Afegaptem no^eangliae
1
10-52'
60,26' 27.1 71 off
SL-w bmd^nszs
8
2000 Mar
I I
Unidentified dolphin
10 10^55* 67-07' 26.3
403 on
2000 Mar 12
Tursiops
rmncanzv
to LUT 6&36' 261 188 on
2000 Mar 12 Unidentified large whale 2
I2,OT
66,36' 26.2 313 off
2000 Mar
13
Sterieflafmrimalis
40 1
1,01' 64.56'
24.7 84 on
2000
Mar
14
Delphinm spp.
8
10.30'
63.56' 23.3 71
on
2000 Mar 14
Delphin- spp-
6 10.30* 63^59' 23.7 62 Off
20DO
Mar 14
Tumiops PvncaW
1
10,30'
64,02-
23.3 59 Off
Delphinus
sPP.
5 1 66
2000
Mar
14
Delphinm
ffpp.
6 10,30- 63,59- 233 68 an
2000 Mar 14
Delphinus sav.
3
tO.30' 64,06'
23.6 59 on
2000 Mar 14
Deiphi^ spp.
10 10 33'
64.04-
23.6
64 on
2000
Mar
14
Delphinw spp.
7 4,31'
64,00- 24.1
75
on
2000 Mar 14 Unidentified dolphin 25
10,29'
6412- 24^2
512 Off
2000 Mar 14 Unidentified dolphin
10 10^26'
64 20'
23.1
421 on
2000 Mar 14 Unidentified dolphin
3
1026 6^'24'
22.6 168 on
2000 Mair 14
Unidentified dolphin
15
1
0^2W
64
30' 23.1 77
on
2000 Mar 14
Raluenoptera spp.
1 10
24^ 6430'
23.0
an
2000 Mar 14
Baiamaptem phyvalav
1 1
0'22- 64'32'
23.3 119
on
2000 Mar 14
Balaenoptera spp.
1 10
22' 64
32' 23.3 119
on
2000 Mar
15
Delphirru spp.
34
1
0^42-
aOY
22.9
42 on
2000 Mar
15
Balaenoptem edem
2 W46-
6,e
17- 23.6
46 on
2000 Mar
15
Unidentified dolphin 4 10`46' 64)
6' 23.8 38 off
2000 Mar
15
Balaenoptem edeni
2
1
W48'
64'1
7'
24.0
26 on
2000 Mar
15
Delphinmrspp.
30
W48' 64%T
23.9
24 on
2DOO
Mar
15
Delphizais spp.
30
IOP49'
V
16'
26.4 46 on
2000
Mar 15
Delphirntrspp-
60 10151'
6Y58'
24.3
51
on
2000 Mar
16
Balaerioptera edeni
1 W59'
6TOT
23.6
102
on
2000 Mar
16
Unidentified
large
whale
I I
ITO'
62'03' 23.5 101
on
2000 Mar
16
Unidentified large whale
1 10 57' 62
04'
23.7 99 off
2000
Mar
16
Unidentified large whale 2
10-56' 62'02' 23.7 106 Go
2000 Mar
16
Bal^mqplera spp.
2
10^56'
6TOV
23.7
104 on
2000 Mar
16
Unidentified large whale
1
I&ST
61'58' 237 117 on
2000 Mar
16
Unidentified large whale
1
10-54'
6P58' 23.8 117 on
2000 Mar
16
Balaenoptera adent
1 10-52' 62-55'
24.9
117
on
2000 Mar
16
Tursiops Inmcaftis
28
10-49'
61-55'
23.7 113 off
2000 Mar P Unidentified dolphin 20 10,54'
63-2T
23.4 49 on
2000 Mar
17
Twswps tmnmtw
8 10-59'
6346
23.0
20
off
20M Mar
17
Salitenoptem edem
2 W-59'
63-45'
24-6 24 on
2000 Mar
17
Megaptera nowzemghae
2
11,101 6148' 23.9
31
on
2OW
Mar 17
Unidentified large whale
1 11 13'
63491 24.0
35 off
continued
15
Table
5.
Continued.
DATE
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar ig
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar
19
2000
Mai
19
2000 Mar
19
2000 Mar 20
2000 Mar 20
2000 Mar 20
2000 Mar 20
2000 Mar 21
2000
Met
21
2000
Mar
2t
2000 Mar 21
2000 Mar 21
2000 Mar 21
2000 Mar 22
2000
Mar
22
2000
Mar
22
2000 Mar
23
2000
Mai
23
2000 Mar
23
2000
Mar
23
2000 Mar
23
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mai 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
1000
Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar 24
2000 Mar
25
2000
Mar
25
2000 Mar 23
2000
Mar
25
2000 Mar
25
2000
Mar
25
2000
Mai
25
2000 Mar
25
2000
Mar
25
2000 Mar
25
2000 Mar
25
SPECIES
Balaenoplem spp.
Unidentified dolphin
Unidentified dolphin
Unidentified dolphin
Stenella affermata
Si,uiefla attenuata
Steriella attenuaw
Peponocephala eleetra
Turstops truncahm
Unidentified dolphin
Stenella alienivita
Afegaptera novaeangliae
Tursiops truncaau
Unidentified
Inge
whale
Tursiops iruncalus
Turs,ops nruncai^
Unidentified large whale
Unidentified large whale
7iirsiops truncano,
71,rsrops truzitafw
-Wegaptem novaeangtiae
7)4rSWjvs truncatus
Unidentified dolphin
Sle"efia
SPP.
Unidentified dolphin
Regaptera novttoangliae
7ipham cavirositis
Physetermacrocephalw
Unidentified dolphin
Kogia
sinuts
Unidentified odontocetc
Turviaps mincahev
Phjveler ma^ro^ep)wlw
Gr-pus grigeus
Physeler macrocephalus
Unidentified dolphin
Glohicephala spp.
Physerer macrocephalus
Physeter macmcephalus
Physelermacroeephahis
Physeler macrocephalus
Slenefla attmuata
Alegaptem
novaeangliae
Wegaptera novaeangliae
Unidentified odomocete
Unidentified dolphin
Unidentified dolphin
Unidentified small whale
Megapiera nov"mighae
Hegapiera novaeang1jac
Afegaptera novaeanghae
Afegaptem novaemg1we
Megaptem novaeangliae
Unidentified dolphin
GROUP
SIZE POSITION
1
30
is
3
5
15
20
38
Is
I
20
50
2
2
25
10
t5
5
35
7
1
3
2
30
3
16
1
3
11
3
9
4
4
1
3
45
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1'43'
61'59'
12"02'
6PS L'
12'03' 6 I'S F
12'03'
61'51'
12-W
61-51'
(2'05'
61-50'
12'06' 61-S&
12^
1
21 61-47'
10-52- 60-32'
10-52' 60-34'
10 39' 60
40'
10-49' 6&43'
10-57' 61^28'
10-56
61-33'
10^55'
6b27'
10-54'
61.25'
10^56' 61.27'
10-55'
61.23'
OX'
59.401
13,0 1'
54,41'
13,16'
59,41'
13,10-
59,41'
13,16'
59^42'
13.tg' 59^41'
13.18' 59 30'
13^ 1 T 5^27'
14^
19' 6059-
KIT
61^03'
14 14'
6( 09-
14
IT 61:15'
1420'
61
VY
14'2 1'
6 I'l 9'
14
23' 61
20'
t4"25-
6
1'2
V
14^25'
61'21'
14^30'
6
['22'
14^34'
6 1'23-
14'38'
6 1'25'
14^44'
6 ['27'
14'4T
6 1'26'
14^48'
6 P25'
14,59,
61,01,
14
58' 60 57'
16-24' 60-47'
16-26'
60-46'
ICY24'
61*03'
l6v2l)'
61-08'
1& 13' 61-08'
16-09' 61-09'
1&09' 6bOT
1&00 6142'
16-06' 61,12'
1645' 61.16'
16 00; 6126'
SST DEPTH
( Q (in)
a
26.2 9 off
26.8 361 on
27.1 677
on
27.1 769 Oil
27.1 1219
on
27.3 1215
on
273 1096
on
26.7 1700
an
27.1 71
on
27.0 75
on
27.4 49 on
27.3
44 on
26.6
121 on
26.0 130
on
26.5 106 off
26.9 92 off
27.0 88
on
27.2
92
off
28.3 269 Go
28A
329 on
27.6 295
on
28.6
512 on
29.0 366
on
28.9 371
on
28.1
522 on
28.1 522
on
27.2 1501
on
27.4
2196
an
27.1 2500
on
273
2500 on
27.2 2500
on
272
2500 on
27.3 2500
on
274
2500
on
27.6 2500
on
27.9
2300 on
27.7 2500
on
30.0
2500
on
27.4
2500
on
27.4
2500 on
274
2500
on
26.8 791
on
27.7 71
on
26.2 390
on
26.3
1210
on
26.3
2745 on
26.4
1208
on
26.3 26
on
26.3 27 Off
26.4
27 off
26.6 309 on
26.6 309 off
26.6 311
on
271 192
on
continued
16
Table
5.
Continued.
DATE SPECIES
GROUP
SIZE POSITION SST
DEPTH
(c)
2000
Mar
25
Megaptera novaeaqgh^
2
15'59' 6 1'28' 27.2 309 off
2000 Mar 25
Megaptem noweangliae
I
ITST
61'29' 27.3 306 off
2000 Mar
26
Kogia sinuir
3 1726' "00' 26.1 800
on
2000
Mar
26
Unidentified dolphin
6 1729'
6,VG3'
262 800
on
2000
Mar
26
Physelff macrucgohalm
I
IP3V
6,P05'
26.5
1501
OR
2000
Mar
26
PeponocephaialFemsa
16 1735'
6,rO8'
26.8 1537
on
2000 Mar
26
Phyveter macrocephaIiis
1 17'36 6,P09' 26.7 1537 an
2000 Mar
26
Physerer -acracwphalw
2 t7'37' 64-1
0' 26.8 888
on
2000 Mar
26
phy3eter ma^ephalw
3 17,39'
64-1 t'
27.1 878
on
2000
Mar
26
Physeter macrocephalur
2
17-39'
64-
1 V 27.2 2013
on
2000 Mar
26
GION,^phla
,pp.
Is 17
45' 64 t45' 27.4
1501
on
2000 Mar
26 Mesoplodon spp-
3 17-47'
64-18'
2'7-5 1299
on
2000 Mar
26 Kogza spp.
3 17^50'
64-20'
27.6
1501
on
2000
Mar
26
Ph^ler macrocephaltis
1
17-54' 64-34'
27.6 1098
on
2000 Mar
26
lakyseler macmcep^uv
2
17^55' 64-35' 27.5 1098
on
2000 Mar
26
Mesopiodon densirostrLv
2
17^55'
"3T
27.8 3660
on
20W Mar
26
Mesoplodon spp-
I 17Z7'
64.42'
27^7 3660
on
2000 Mar
26
Unidentified odonwcete 2 iIST 64.451
27.5 3660
on
2000 Mar
26
Kogia spp-
4
18,02'
"5T
28.1 2580
on
2000
Mar
26
Kagia spp.
2 1&03' 64,59'
27.0 2599
on
2000 Mar
26
Physeter marrocephahm
1 18,07- 65,02' 26.1 893
on
2000 Mar
26
Stenellafmmahs
30 18,08- 65,02' 26.1 893
on
2000 Mar
28
Regaptem noweang1we
1 18.59
66,41'
26.1 3660
on
2000 Mar
28
Aftaptera novaeanglim
1
19.04'
67^13' 26.1
son
on
2000 Mar
29
Megaptem novaeangfiac
1
20^ 14'
70.15-
25.5 4160
on
2000 Mar
29
Unidentified dolphin
5
20^21' 70,54- 20.4 4026 on
2000 Mar
29
Stenella spp.
3
20,24'
71 08' 26.6
4008
On
2000 Mar
29
Unidentified odontocete
3 20^27' 7%26'
26.4 4026 on
2000 Mar
29
Unidentified latV whale
1
20 3V
71 51' 262
4026
on
2000 Apr
01
Stemilafmnfahs
10 25
022'
93
35'
25.4
77 on
2000 Apr
01
Unidentified odontocem
1 2539' 8408- 1-6.0 165
on
2000 Apr
01
Simellaspp.
15 26"06'
84'35' 25.4 249
on
2000 Apr 02
Stenella spp.
3 28 33' 86 55'
24.2
761
on
2000
Apr
02
Stmella atienuata
25 29'01' 87"21'
24.6
1373
on
17
Table
6.
Number of "on effort" visual sightings and acoustic detections of singing hurupback whales during leg
I
and
leg 2 of the Gordon Gunter Windwards cruise
GU - 00- OL
AREA-LEGI
SURVEYDATFS VISUALSIGHTINGS ACOUSTIC
DETECTIONS
St.
Kitts and Nevis
17-18
February
0 7
Guadeloupe
19
February
0 7
Martinique 20-21 February
1 7
St. Lucia 22 February
0
2
Grenada
23
February
1, 1 C/c
pair
0
Barbados 24 Febmary
0 0
Tobago
& E.
Trinidad
26-27
February
1 0
Other Trinidad
&
Gulf of Paris
28-29
February
3 0
Sub-Total:
6, IC/c
pair
30
AREA
- LEG
2
Venezuela 10-14 Much 2
11
Grenada
19
March
0
5
Trinidad-Tobago 20-21 March
1 6
Barbados
22-23
March 2
5
Martinique 24 March
1 7
Guadeloupe
25
Much
9 10
Sub-Total:
15
44
GRAND
TOTAL: 2r,
IC/,
pair 74
18
Table
7.
Summary of cetacean sighting& from which biopsy samples were collected during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01,
Febmary
9 - April 3,
2000.
DATE
11ME
SIGHTING SPECIES
LAT
LON
2/27/00 1236
2
Megapf^a navae^gfim
11068 60330
2/2a/00 1042 2
Megaptera nome"ghae
10306 60301
V28/00 1410
3
Megaplera wv""gfiae
10252 60466
3/13/00
745
1
Sfenellafivn(aUs
11M 64573
3/14/00
759 1
Delphinus
spp.
10306 63573
3/14/00
759 1
Delphinusspp.
10306 63573
3/14/00 822 2
Delphinus spp.
f0307 59860
3/14/00
858
4
Delphinmspp.
10309
64009
3/14/00
1007 6
Delphinw spp.
10332
64044
3/14100
1007 6
Delphinw W.
10332
64044
3/15/00
940 2
Bal^nopfera edeni
10472 64192
3115/00 1335 7
Delphinta spp.
10504
63571
311 StOO 1335 7
Delphinw spp.
10504
63571
3/21/00
1400 4
Tursops fnewaftis
10531 61MO
3121/00
1430 4
Tumops mtncaw
10532
61269
3/22fOO
1430
1
Tursiops tmncatus
13016
59430
3/23/00
1340
1
7h^,ops Intacatus
13122
59431
4/02/00
1615 2
SleAefia attenwia
29038 97238
4102/00
1615
2
stenella 4ae^w
29038 87238
19
Figure
1.
Locations of survey effort during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01
25-7,
20-1
er
15-1
Venemela
85 80 75 70 65 60
Figure 2. Location of cetacean sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1
3
+
++
25- +
l> -
L
2
C^
4L
10
85 80 75 70 65 60
30---,
25---^
0 0
=-:
^V
10
15---^
llc>
FII'^
10^
75
- '
F
70
Venemela
j
I
65 60
Figure
3.
Locations of humpback whale (n--33^ sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01
20---
30--^
0
15^
^.x
+
U.ide.tifiedhal.opmidwhal.
0
Fin whale
0
Bryde's whale
x sp. whale
T
60
Figure 4. Location of unidentified balaenopterid whale (n=4), fm whale (n=1), Bryde's whale (n--5)
and sperim whale (n--16) sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01.
Venemela
70 6
5
+
DwufTem whale
0
cuvices beaked whale
0
Bli.ville!s
beaked whale
X Mel^haaded whale
Figure
5.
Location of dwarf sperm whale (n--2), Cuviei's beaked whale (n=
1),
Blainville's beaked whale (n7-1)
and melon-headed whale (n7-
1)
sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1.
30--7-1
25-
20-
+
15
Venewel^
a
75 70
65
60
I
75
+
False killer whale
0
Pilotwh.].
0
Rough4oathed dolphin
X presses dolphin
I
I
Figure
6.
Location of false killer whale (n=]), pilot whale (n--7),rough-toothed dolphin (n=6)
and Fraser's dolphin (n7-1) sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1.
3
25-
20--
b
15-
170
I I i
70 65 60
^7 - -
^
Boolmosedolphin
0
Rissdsdolphin
0
Unicimfifiedstenellid dolphin
X Delphinus
spp.
0
Figure
7.
Location of bottlenose dolphin (n--19), Risso's dolphin (n--I), unidentified stenellid dolphin (n--5)
and Delphinus
spp. (n7--l
1)
sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1.
3
0
0
85 go 75 70 65
I
3
2^
r--
Ptnuopical spooled dolphin
0
Atlantic
^md
dolphin
0
Spinn^r dolphin
60
Figure8. Location of pantropical spotted dolphin (n--10), Atlantic spotted dolphin (n=8),
and spinner dolphin (n--2) sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1 -
<i
Venewela
w 90
75
70 65
-10 1
0 b
i
Kovaspp.
*
Elmlenose/AlImficspot^&lPhin
* Melon^lheaded/Pygmykiller whale
Figure
9.
Location of
Kogia
spp. (n--3),
Mesoplodon
spp. (n7-2), bottlenose/Atlantic spotted dolphin (n--7),
and melon-headed/pynigy killer whale (n--
1)
sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 -0 1.
3
25-
20--
1 7
z^,
to,6x
D
Venemela
01-f
75 70 65 60
*
Uaideratified dolphin
*
Unidentified small whale
*
Usidenfified large whale
X U.identifind.dooments
+
95 80 75 70 65 60
Figure
10.
Location of unidentified dolphin (n=26), unidentified small whale (rr--I), unidentified large whale (n--12)
and unidentified odontocete. (n--9) sightings during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01.
3^
x
25-
c:^
0
67
Ox+
20-
+
0
1
Venemela
Figure
11.
Sonobuoy deployment (Leg
1)
during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1 -
20
18
16
14
12
10
-74
-72
-70
-68 -66
longitude
-64
-62
-60
Figure 12. Sonobuoy deployment (Leg 2) during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01.
20
-19
17 -
16 -
15 -
elf
,
14-
13 -
12
11
10
-72 -70 -68 -66
-64 -62
-60
longitude
?
0
--eP
13 0
1
30^
75 70 65
60
Figure
13.
Location of biopsy samples obtained from humpback whales (n--3),
and Bryde's whale (n=1) during Cruise
GU - 00 - 01,
25-
201^
Vmezuela
I
+
AtIontic spoffed dolphin
0 D^Iphimo vp
* Baftl...^.
dolphin
* Pantropical sponed dolphin
Figure 14. Location of biopsy samples obtain from Atlantic spotted dolphin (rr--1), unidentified
Delphinus (n=8),
bottlenose dolphin (n=4) and pantropical spotted dolphin (n12) during Cruise
GU - 00 - 0 1.
3^
x
21
1
(7
10--
T
-7
F
I
.1 so 75 70 65