whales in each area.surveyed is shown in Table
6. A
total of
30
singing whales were detected
during "on effort" surveys during Leg
I
and 44 during Leg 2 of the survey. This is compared to
8
and
15
humpback whales sighted during the same "on efforf
'
survey in Legs
1
and 2,
respectively. The greater number of acoustic detections relative to visual sightings demonstrates
the advantage of passive acoustic over visual methods for surveys in these areas and during
environmental conditions that severely limit the effectiveness of visual methods. Future analyses
of these data will form the basis of an estimation of the relative density of humpback whales in
the Southeastern Caribbean.
Cetacean Biol)s
Nineteen biopsy samples were obtained during the cruise (Leg
1,
n
= 3;
Leg 2, n
= 16)
(Table
7).
Humpback whale biopsies were considered the primary objective, and three skin and
blubber samples were collected (Fig-
14
In addition, six other species were sampled including
Atlantic spotted dolphin (n
= 1),
Common dolphin (n
8),
Bryde's whale (n
= 1),
bottlenose
dolphins (n
=
4), and pantropical. spotted dolphins (n 2) (Figs.
133
andl4). Humpback whale
biopsy samples were sent to Dr. Per
J.
Palsboll at the University of Wales Bangor, United
Kingdom for analysis, archiving, and comparison with the North Atlantic humpback whale
population genetic database.
All
other biopsy samples were sent to Dr. Patty Rosel at the
NOAA,
National Ocean Service
(NOS)
Laboratory in Charleston, South Carolina for analysis
and archiving.
Environmental data
Profiles from the
SBE 9/11
Sea logger
CTD,
other environmental data, and data from the
ship's
SCS
were returned to the
NMFS
Pascagoula Laboratory for editing and archiving.
. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank IOCARIBE for their sponsorship and encouragement of this multi-
national survey for humpback whales in the Southeastern Caribbean. We also extend our
gratitude to the Eastern Caribbean nations that provided clearance to conduct this survey and that
provided assistance during the cruise. Special thanks go to the Officers and Crew of the
NOAA
ship Gordon Gunter, and the staff of the
SEFSC
Pascagoula Laboratory for logistical and
technical support. We could not have had a more dedicated scientific team, that often preformed
above and beyond the normal call of duty. To all of the science party from all of the participating
nations, we are pleased to have sailed with you and hope we will work together again.
Assistance critical to the success of this survey was provided
by
many individuals, but we wish
to especially thank Fred Berry, Bradford Brown, David Chadee, Phil Clapham, Tom Coxe,
Shelby Drummond, Wayne Hoggard, Keith Mullin, Randi Olsen, Charlie Potter, Per Palsboll,
Randy Reeves, Carol Roden, Donna Spencer, Rafael Steer-Ruiz, and Jim Tobias.
6