36 AFI13-217 10 MAY 2007
2.20.2.1. Measuring. The distance from the PI to the load is measured when precise scores are
required. The distance is measured using a precision measuring device (odometer, laser range
finders, pre-measured length of cord, measuring tapes, cyclometer, GPS, etc.).
2.20.2.2. Pacing. Score is measured by physically pacing the distance from the PI to the place
where the parachutist or equipment load landed.
2.20.2.3. Estimating. Used when there is insufficient time or personnel to pace. The distance from
the PI to the load is visually estimated. To assist in scoring by this method, markers (visible from
the PI) may be placed at desired locations from the PI at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock positions. If the
markers are used, indicate this to the aircrew.
2.21. Off Drop Zone Reporting Procedures. In addition to the paragraphs below, users will refer to
AFJ 13-210(I), Joint Airdrop Inspection Records, Malfunction Investigations, and Activity Reporting.
2.21.1. When an off DZ airdrop has been confirmed or suspected, the aircrew involved will not
attempt another drop for the remainder of the mission. In the case of an off DZ drop involving injury
or death to personnel, the mission will be terminated and the aircraft will land as soon as possible.
Retain all paperwork involved in the flight to aid in the investigation. Aircrews will immediately
report information regarding off DZ airdrops to a USAF Command Post. Unit safety offices will be
notified as soon as possible. Off DZ mishaps resulting in death or serious injury shall be referred to
safety and accident investigation boards convened under the appropriate regulations.
2.21.2. Units with DZC/DZSO/DZST responsibilities will develop local procedures and communica-
tions processes to obtain emergency assistance to preserve life and limb, secure the site, and notify the
airlift and user's chain of command. The first notification step should be through the airdrop aircraft
for relay to a USAF command post. Alternative means may include relay through any local US mili-
tary installation. Local installations may also be able to assist with emergency response resources
including, aircraft rescue and fire fighting, law enforcement, and public affairs.
2.21.2.1. Wings/operations groups will develop guidance for aircrews and DZ personnel for the
capture and reporting of in-flight data relating to an off-DZ airdrop and/or airdrop malfunction.
This data must have enough detail to re-create the circumstances surrounding the incident for the
aerial delivery review panel. Accurate and timely capture of data is critical and is the responsibil-
ity of the aircraft commander.
2.21.2.2. Aircrews involved in an airdrop malfunction will not attempt another drop for the
remainder of the mission until approved by the unit’s OG/CC, DIRMOBFOR, or USAF base OG/
CC with airdrop expertise from which the mission was launched and returned.
2.21.3. The aircrew’s OG/CC, or equivalent, shall appoint an aerial delivery review panel to investi-
gate all off DZ airdrops. However, when performing off-station airdrop missions at an Air Force Base
with airdrop expertise (e.g. Pope AFB), the aircrew’s OG/CC may authorize the host unit OG/CC to
perform the aerial delivery review panel IAW paragraph 2.21.5.
Panel members should include the
Operations Support Squadron (OSS) chief of tactics (chairperson); a tactics pilot, navigator, and load-
master; a stan/eval pilot, navigator, and loadmaster; airdrop inspector loadmaster, flying safety officer,
and crewmembers from the incident. The chairperson may modify panel composition based on the
nature of the situation under review.
2.21.4. The Flying Safety Officer will determine if the airdrop incident is reportable in accordance
with AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports. The aerial delivery review panel will be prepared