A-12
ity of the action itself distinguished from its anticipated conse-
quences. In this case, confidentiality concerns basic respect for
adolescent patients as persons, respect for their autonomy and
recognition of their right to privacy. Only recently have these
principles been applied to the medical care of teenagers (32).
This has created a dilemma for professionals who must balance
their interest in protecting the health of their adolescent
patients by providing appropriate, timely, confidential care and
the desires of parents to know about the condition of their
minor children and make decisions regarding their care.
Because adolescents vary in their psychosocial and economic
autonomy, it becomes impossible to apply a single moral pre-
scription in all cases. It is necessary to ground confidentiality
in the moral necessity of respect for the individual while rec-
ognizing that it is permissible to breach confidentiality in
selected instances, and only when certain requisites have been
fulfilled. Should these special circumstances not be respected
because a professional thinks it would be inconvenient or diffi-
cult, a clear moral breach will have occurred in which a physi-
cian places personal needs above those of the patient.
Excessive paternalism results if confidentiality is disregarded
because the physician decides what is “best” for the adolescent
without a strong and persuasive reason.
Paternalism has been defined as either an interference with a
person’s freedom of action (33), as a “refusal to accept or
acquiesce in an individual’s choices, wishes and actions,” (34)
or as an act of coercion (35). Clinicians need to be extremely
cautious when deciding to break confidentiality because it may
seriously jeopardize the provider-patient relationship (36).
However, in cases of suicidal or homicidal ideation or gestures,
serious chemical dependence, the youth’s disclosure of physi-
cal or sexual abuse and life threatening medical conditions
(i.e., eating disorders), it may be necessary to disclose private
information to the adolescent’s caretakers or others. Silber (37)
has proposed that “justified paternalism” in the care of adoles-
cents could be appropriate under these circumstances, provid-
ed two conditions are met: reasonable evidence that an adoles-
cent’s capacity for autonomy is impaired; and, protecting the
adolescent’s life is the central goal. Thus, protecting life out-
weighs the principle of autonomy.
Should the physician encounter a circumstance in which “jus-
tified paternalism” and disclosure better serves the adolescent,
there is still a moral duty to respect the adolescent. This can be
accomplished by explaining the reason for breaching confi-
dentiality and involving the patient in the process of revealing
the confidential information.
Legal Issues and Guidelines
Legal provisions which support confidentiality include, among
others, avoiding embarrassment and humiliation, protecting
personal and family security, and avoiding discrimination or
denial of service (38). For adolescents, legal protection for the
maintenance of confidentiality serves two primary purposes.
The first purpose (as has been discussed) is clinical utility and
encourages them to seek necessary medical care. The second
legal purpose is to grant adult rights to those minors who
deserve them by virtue of their maturity. The minor who has
achieved a level of maturity sufficient to enable him or her to
give informed consent generally is entitled to the associated
privacy of information.
The law has evolved in important ways over the past several
decades in the degree to which it protects, or at least, does not
impede the provision of confidential health services for ado-
lescents. Nevertheless, there continue to be areas in which the
current legal system fails to provide adequate protection, par-
ticularly with respect to current changes in the health care
delivery system, such as the rapid shift to managed care.
Moreover, care management will attempt to standardize health
care delivery methods and might threaten the unique privacy
needs of adolescents in such areas as medical records, care
pathways, and gatekeeper functions.
Sources of the Confidentiality Obligation in the Law
There are numerous sources of the general legal obligation to
maintain the confidentiality of medical information for adoles-
cents (12,38). These sources include federal and state statutes,
constitutional provisions, and regulations, policies, and proto-
cols of federal and state agencies. Many, but not all, of these
provisions have been interpreted in court decisions. In particu-
lar, the concept of the “mature minor” has been developed by
state and federal courts over the past several decades. The con-
cept of the “mature minor” applies to those situations in which
an adolescent has the capacity to give an informed consent and
is being provided with non-complex care that is within the
mainstream of medical practice (39). Thus, the extent to which
the law impedes or facilitates the protection of confidentiality
in adolescent health care depends not only on the consideration
of a broad range of overlapping and interconnected legal pro-
visions, but also on an understanding of how those provisions
have been, or might in the future, be interpreted by the courts.
Confidentiality and Consent
The dual concepts of confidentiality and consent are inextrica-
bly linked in the way the law affects the delivery of health care
to adolescents who are younger than 18 years, the age of major-
ity in almost every state. First, whenever consent for care is
required from a parent or other third party, such as a court or
child welfare agency, it is not possible for complete confiden-
tiality to be maintained. Second, some laws authorizing minors
to consent to their own care also require (or permit) that a par-
ent or another person or entity be informed. Third, some laws
governing the confidentiality and disclosure of medical infor-
mation explicitly rely on the medical consent laws in delineat-
ing who controls the confidentiality of health information for
minors, and even when they do not, the consent laws may pro-
vide implicit support for confidentiality (40).
Generally the law requires the consent of a parent when health
care is provided to a minor child, although there are numerous
exceptions to this requirement (12). Exceptions include med-
ical emergencies, laws which specifically authorize minors to
consent to their own care and care for the “mature minor.”
Consent may also be required from a third party such as a legal