Introduction 15
three years—more than days. Many scholars believe it is extremely
likely that He repeated the same teachings on many occasions. I am
quite sure this is the case. is may account for some of the differences
in the Gospel accounts on similar teachings of Christ. at is, Christ
may have communicated the same truth on a number of different occa-
sions, and on each occasion He may have communicated that truth in
a slightly unique way. is has led some scholars to surmise that seem-
ingly parallel accounts of a teaching may actually refer to two different
teaching events. We can’t be certain about such things, but I am con-
vinced this is what happened. Of course, the important point is that
Christ gave us these teachings, not the precise order in which He deliv-
ered them.
It is possible that some of the differences in the Gospel accounts are
partly due to the reality that Jesus may have spoken three languages—
Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. e New Testament, of course, was writ-
ten in Greek. If Jesus gave a teaching to a Jewish audience in Hebrew
or Aramaic, each Gospel writer’s rendering of that teaching in Greek
may have been slightly different from the others’.
Further, we must note that unlike modern writers, the ancients
were not overly fixated on verbal exactitude. ey didn’t use quotation
marks in those days. Nor did they use ellipsis dots to note that words
were deleted, or brackets to indicate clarifying insertions by the Gos-
pel writers. ese are all modern inventions, and we would be wrong
to impose such writing protocols on the ancients. But the biblical writ-
ers were nevertheless trustworthy in all that they wrote.
Perhaps an illustration might help. Imagine three bystanders wit-
nessing a car accident at a street intersection.
e first witness says, “e truck hit the car.”
e second witness says, “e girl in that red truck hit the blue car.”
e third witness says, “e blond girl in that red Ford F- hit
the blue sedan, driven by a redheaded guy with freckles.”
ese are not contradictory accounts. ey are partial, complemen-
tary descriptions of what happened. Taken together, we can reconstruct
a trustworthy composite report.
Consider the death of Judas. In Matthew :, we are told that