CLIENT INVITE TEMPLATE _ REQUESTS FOR TENDER FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 6
3.7 SUBMISSION LODGEMENT
AND TIMEFRAMES
Clear submission lodgement procedures, including
timing, delivery method and response format are
essential, whether in digital, hardcopy or via an online
E-portal. For the purposes of probity, it is critical that
clients maintain transparency and fairness in the tender
process. Competing architects must be treated fairly
and evaluated objectively. Failure to do so will result in
fewer responses in the future as practices decide not to
pursue opportunities with clients that have demonstrated
poor probity in the past.
Submission requirements should be minimised to
enable succinct, readily comparable responses, and to
mitigate costs to all parties in preparation and evaluation.
Submissions without page or word limits produce
excessively large documents, as respondents attempt to
enhance their submission and cover all possible angles
byincludingsuperuousmaterial.
For RFTs, the Institute recommends written responses
be limited to the following pages per question:
• Executivesummary(1page)
• Keypersonnelandresourcing(3pages)
• Projectexperience(3pages)
• Projectunderstanding(1page)
• Methodologyandstakeholderengagement(2pages)
• Professionalrecognitionandinnovation(1page)
• Feeandoverallhours(1page)
Assessment of architect’s submissions is significantly
improved and expedited by requesting carefully
targeted, specific responses, rather than long generic
statements covering issues typical in all architectural
design commissions. To ensure submissions are concise
and include only necessary information, clients should
include a clause stating extensive marketing documents
or generic practice information should not be included
and will not be reviewed. Deliverables should be clearly
specified, and no additional materials submitted should
be considered in the assessing submissions.
Appendices cause confusion and lengthen submissions
and should not be requested or allowed.
It is important to ensure submission requirements:
• Areproportionaltotheproject’ssizeandcomplexity
• Detailspecicphysicalordigitallodgementdetails
with time, date and preferred format
• Detailproceduresforfairandtimelyclarications
• Detailproceduresfornon-conformingsubmissions
• Avoidaddendawithinvebusinessdaysof
submission closing
• Clearlystateanyconictofinterestorprobity
measures
• Adheretostatedevaluationtimeframes
• Allowadequatetimeforarchitectstodevelop
considered proposals. The minimum time
recommended for an RFT is 2-3 weeks for simple
projects while 3-6 weeks should be allowed for
complex, high cost or major infrastructure projects.