306 –— VIVENDI –— ANNUAL REPORT 2018 –—
—
VIVENDI
—
ANNUAL REPORT 2018
—
307
1
Note23. Litigation
4
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FORTHEYEAR ENDED DECEMBER31, 2018
13
23
33
43
Telecom Italia
On August5, 2017, the Italian Government informed Vivendi that it was
opening a formal investigation into whether certain provisions of Law
Decree No.21 of 15March2012 on special powers of the Italian
Government relative to the defense and national security sectors (Article1)
and to activities of strategic importance in the fields of energy, transport
and communications (Article2), had been respected by Telecom Italia and
Vivendi. Vivendi considered the provisions of that decree inapplicable to
Vivendi. In particular, (i) Article1, concerning the defense and national
security sectors had never been hitherto declared and communicated to the
market given the nature of the activities carried out by Telecom Italia, and
(ii) Article2, which relates to the energy, transport and communications
sectors, does not apply to Vivendi since it refers to purchases of significant
shareholdings made by non-European entities.
Additionally, and in the same timeframe as the above-mentioned investi-
gation, on September13, 2017, the Consob declared that Vivendi exercises
de facto control over Telecom Italia. Vivendi and Telecom Italia formally
contest this position and appealed to the competent courts.
On September28, 2017, the Presidency of the Council of Ministers declared
that (i) the notification made by Vivendi under Article1 of the aforemen-
tioned legislative decree as a precautionary measure was made late and (ii)
Telecom Italia had not made a notification under Article1 of the decree
following a change of control over its asset that are of strategic importance
in the fields of energy, transport and communications. Therefore, the
Presidency of the Council of Ministers launched proceedings against
Telecom Italia for failing to make the required notification under Article2 of
the same legislative decree. Vivendi and Telecom Italia have appealed this
finding.
Furthermore, by a decree dated October16, 2017, the Italian Government
decided to exercise the special powers laid down in Article1 of the 2012
legislative decree, relative to the defense and national security sectors. This
decree imposes a numberof organizational and governance measures on
Vivendi and Telecom Italia and its two subsidiaries, Telecom Italia Sparkle
Spa (“Sparkle”) and Telsy Elettronica e Telecomunicazioni Spa (“Telsy”). In
particular, Telecom Italia, Sparkle and Telsy must have a division in charge
of supervising all activities related to defense and national security, which
is fully autonomous and endowed with human and financial resources
sufficient to guarantee its independence, and to appoint to their governing
bodies a memberwho is an Italian citizen, who is approved by the Italian
Government and who has security clearance. It also requires the
establishment of a Supervisory Committee under the auspices of the
Council of Ministers (Comitato di monitoraggio) to monitor compliance with
these obligations. On February13, 2018, Vivendi and Telecom Italia filed an
appeal against this decree with the Italian Presidency of the Council of
Ministers.
In addition, by a decree dated November2, 2017, the Italian Government
decided to implement the special powers conferred by Article2 of the 2012
legislative decree, relative to the fields of energy, transport and
communications. This decree imposes on Telecom Italia the obligation to
implement development, investment and maintenance plans for its
networks to guarantee their operation and security, to provide universal
service, and, more generally, to satisfy public interest in the medium and
long term, under the control of the Comitato di monitoraggio, who must be
notified of any reorganization of the Telecom Italia group’s holdings or any
project having an impact on the security, availability and operation of the
networks. On March2, 2018, Vivendi and Telecom Italia filed an appeal
against this decree with the Italian Presidency of the Council of Ministers.
By a decree dated May8, 2018, the Italian Government imposed an
administrative fine of €74millions on Telecom Italia for failure to comply with
its information obligations (failure to notify under Article2 of Law Decree
No.21 of March15, 2012, see above). On July5, 2018, the Administrative
Regional Court of Lazio suspended the enforcement of such fine.
Etisalat against Vivendi
On May12, 2017, Etisalat and EINA filed a request for arbitration before the
International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamberof Commerce
pursuant to the terms of the agreement for the sale of SPT/Maroc Telecom
entered into on November4, 2013, the closing of which took place on
May14, 2014. This request concerned several claims in respect of
representations and warranties made by Vivendi and SFR in connection
with the sale agreement. On January3, 2019, the Arbitral Tribunal rendered
its decision, rejecting Etisalat’s claim for compensation in its entirety.
Parabole Réunion
In July2007, the Parabole Réunion filed a legal action before the Paris
Tribunal of First Instance following the termination of its rights to exclusively
distribute the TPS channels in Reunion Island, Mayotte, Madagascar and
Mauritius, and the degradation of the channels made available to it.
Pursuant to a decision dated September18, 2007, Canal+ Group was
prohibited, under threat of a fine, from allowing the broadcast by third parties
of these channels or replacement channels that have substituted these
channels and was ordered to replace the TPS Foot channel in the event it is
dropped. Canal+ Group appealed this decision. In a ruling dated June19,
2008, the Paris Court of Appeal partially reversed the judgment and stated
that these replacement channels were not to be granted exclusively if the
channels were made available to third parties prior to the merger with TPS.
Parabole Réunion was unsuccessful in its claims concerning the content of
the channels in question. On November10, 2009, the French Supreme Court
dismissed the appeal brought by Parabole Réunion.
On September24, 2012, Parabole Réunion filed a claim against Canal+
France, Canal+ Group and Canal+ Distribution before the enforcement
magistrate of the Court of First Instance of Nanterre seeking enforcement of
the fine imposed by the Paris Tribunal of First Instance and confirmed by the
Court of Appeal. On November6, 2012, Parabole Réunion expanded its
claim to cover the TPS Star, Cinecinema Classic, Cult and Star channels. On
April9, 2013, the enforcement magistrate dismissed in part Parabole
Réunion’s claim and declared the rest inadmissible. He took care to recall
that Canal+ Group had no legal obligation with respect to the content or the
maintaining of programming on channels made available to Parabole
Réunion and held, after noting that production of the TPS Foot channel had
not stopped, that there was no need to replace this channel. Parabole
Réunion filed a first appeal against this decision on April11, 2013. On
May22, 2014, the Versailles Court of Appeal declared this appeal
inadmissible due to Parabole Réunion’s lack of representative capacity. On
February14, 2014, Parabole Réunion filed an appeal on points of law and
filed a second appeal against the April9, 2013 decision. On April9, 2015,
the French Supreme Court overturned the May22, 2014 decision of the
Versailles Court of Appeal in which the appeal filed by Parabole Réunion on
April11, 2013 was declared inadmissible. The case was remanded to the
Paris Court of Appeal which, on May12, 2016, upheld the decision of the
Court of First Instance and dismissed all of Parabole Réunion’s claims. In a
decision issued on September28, 2017, the French Supreme Court
dismissed Parabole Réunion’s appeal against the decision of the Court of
Appeal of Paris.
At the same time, on August11, 2009, Parabole Réunion filed a complaint
against Canal+ Group before the Paris Tribunal of First Instance, requesting
that the Tribunal order Canal+ Group to make available a channel with a
level of attractiveness similar to that of TPS Foot in 2006 and to pay
damages. On April26, 2012, Parabole Réunion also filed a complaint
against Canal+ France, Canal+ Group and Canal+ Distribution before the
Paris Tribunal of First Instance requesting the Tribunal to acknowledge the
failure of the companies of the group to fulfill their contractual obligations
to Parabole Réunion and their commitments to the Ministry of Economy.
These two actions have been consolidated into a single action. On April29,
2014, the Paris Tribunal of First Instance partially recognized the admissibility